[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Search] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized

To: <fwp@technofile.org>
Subject: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
From: Peter Scott <Peter@PSDT.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:37:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <NDBBJGKFIKCJNEBAKGPCOEBECOAA.josh@3io.com>
References: <Pine.ISC.3.91.1000830154423.4191H-100000@pcwiwb.wiwb.uscourts.gov>

At 10:26 AM 8/31/00 -0400, Josh Goldberg wrote:
>what if all the signals on a light are unknown?  then the car would never
>move again.
>Perhaps make 'slow_down' the default method for unknown signals, and then
>drivers can modify the signal's meaning through 'add_go_color',
>'add_slow_color' or
>'add_stop_color' methods

All of this fluffery is an attempt to disguise the ugly truth from the 
user: we do not have safe signal handling.

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
  - From: "Josh Goldberg" <josh@3io.com>

References:
- RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
  - From: Andy Bach <root@wiwb.uscourts.gov>
- RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
  - From: "Josh Goldberg" <josh@3io.com>

Prev by Date: [FWP] RecDescent, perhaps? math expression parsing
Next by Date: Re: [FWP] RecDescent, perhaps? math expression parsing
Prev by thread: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
Next by thread: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
Navigation: Date Index | Thread Index | Search | Other lists at bumppo.net