[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Search] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized

To: "Peter Scott" <Peter@PSDT.com>, <fwp@technofile.org>
Subject: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
From: "Josh Goldberg" <josh@3io.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 18:14:54 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20000831113520.00aacbf0@psdt.com>

> All of this fluffery is an attempt to disguise the ugly truth from the 
> user: we do not have safe signal handling.
> 

agreed, thus the need for standard external signals whether they be colors
or sounds or camels

==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl?  Well, if you insist...
==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_
====   unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
  - From: "Casey R. Tweten" <crt@kiski.net>

References:
- RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
  - From: Peter Scott <Peter@PSDT.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [FWP] another word for object?
Next by Date: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
Prev by thread: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
Next by thread: RE: [FWP] Traffic Signals Should be Rationalized
Navigation: Date Index | Thread Index | Search | Other lists at bumppo.net