Re: [MacPerl] oops!

[jwb@olympus.net (John W. Baxter)]

At 11:52 6/1/96, David H. Adler wrote:
>So the coprocessor thing might be it. Does MacPerl 4.1.8 not need one, but
>5 does. 4.1.8 does work on my machine.
>
>Also, as mentioned above, I don't know for sure if I have a math
>coprocessor or not. Does anyone out there know what the story is for a
>6115?

A 6115 does not have an emulated math co-processor when running emulated
680x0 code.

It does do floating point in the PPC chip (not with a coprocessor) when
running PPC code.

One hopes you are running PPC code.

   --John

  --
   Development of software takes longer and costs more.
jwbaxter@olympus.net (John W. Baxter)  Port Ludlow, WA, USA