At 9:45 am +0200 07.05.97, Lasse Hiller¿e Petersen wrote: >... I'm sure CRLF precedes MicroSnot DOS by a decade or so. It >certainly was used in CP/M ... In a wicked >way CRLF even makes sense on slow machines with slow output devices and >moderate storage. Surely CRLF dates from the early electro-mechanical output devices (such as teleprinters) where one code was required to send the carriage back to the start position and a second one to force a linefeed. There must have been cases where it made sense to issue one without the other, so the two were kept separate. CRLF makes sense when you think of physically controlling a device, but it's a poor choice as a logical separator. I suppose we should be grateful that it was Microsoft who stumbled into that particular Bad Design Decision; it could just as easily have been Apple. It's just a pity that Apple didn't go with the UNIX standard from the outset. Wonder what they'll use in Rhapsody, and if it'll change depending on whether you're in the Yellow or the Blue Box? There's a whole can of worms just waiting to be opened there. I just hope they don't decide to standardize on tab, or Ctrl-G (BEL) or something ... A -- angus@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~angus "If I repent anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior. What demon possessed me that I behaved so well?" [H.D. Thoreau] ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch