>At 2:27 Uhr +0200 19.08.1997, Vicki Brown wrote: >>If you're just trying to make the boss happy so s/he doesn't see all those >>files and folders in the MacPerl installation, wouldn't a MacPerl Runtime >>"app" suffice for "invisiblity"? > >Or maybe a shared lib + wrapper app for scripts (with accompanying >modules?). But from my understanding of what Matthias said previously this >would amount to the same (concerning memory usage, in particular) as saving >scripts as Runtime apps, but without that much code duplication. > >Michael Indeed- and the code duplication COULD save a lot of space. It would also (probably) be a little bit faster than an OSA extention, but that's a guess. Either way, that would fill my needs as well, I'm sure. -Strider ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch