Re: [MacPerl] MacPERL Performace vs. Intel Class systems

["David C. Schooley" <schooley@ee.gatech.edu>]

At 3:15 PM -0400 on 10/13/97, Paul DuBois supposedly said:
>I ran the test program on my 9600/300 and it took ... 1 second.
>
>
>>Good Work Matthias...
>>
>>I just re-ran my performance test using 5.1.4r4 and we get a nice
>>performance improvement with the new version.
>>
>>                     5.1.3r2        5.1.4r4
>>Quadra 800:       80 Seconds     43 Seconds

I ran it multiple times on my trusty 6100/60. 8 seconds was typical,
although I saw several runs of 7 seconds. Running it on one of our Ultras
gives the same 3 second timing as shown below. It's kind of funny that this
3.5 year old machine still holds its own with the Pentium Pro.

later,

---Dave---


>>...
>> >
>> >Here are some benchmarks I have run:
>> >
>> >Machine      Elapsed     Comment
>> >Pentium      12 Sec      Linux
>> >SPARC IPC    68 seconds  (with other processes running)
>> >SPARC 2      37 seconds  (with other processes running)
>> >SPARC Ultra   3 seconds  140 Mhz UltraSPARC
>> >
>> >Pentium 60   19 seconds  DOS 6.2
>> >Pentium 90   15 seconds  DOS 6.2
>> >386/25      287 seconds  DOS 6.2 <grin>
>> >486/66       22 seconds  Win 95
>> >Pent Pro/200  6 seconds  Win 95
>> >
>> >Mac IIci    180 seconds  68030 @ 16 Mhz
>> >Quadra 800   80 Seconds  68040 @ 33 Mhz
>> >Mac 8500/150 18 Seconds  (MacPERL installed for PowerPC)
>> >

later,

---Dave---



=========================================================
David C. Schooley              | "Success is how high you
Ph.D. in progress              |  bounce after you hit
Georgia Tech Electric Power    |  bottom.
mailto:schooley@ece.gatech.edu |   - General George S. Patton
http://www.ee.gatech.edu/users/schooley/



***** Want to unsubscribe from this list?
***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch