Re: [MacPerl] MacPERL Performace vs. Intel Class systems

[Paul DuBois <paul@snake.net>]

I ran the test program on my 9600/300 and it took ... 1 second.


>Good Work Matthias...
>
>I just re-ran my performance test using 5.1.4r4 and we get a nice
>performance improvement with the new version.
>
>                     5.1.3r2        5.1.4r4
>Quadra 800:       80 Seconds     43 Seconds
>...
> >
> >Here are some benchmarks I have run:
> >
> >Machine      Elapsed     Comment
> >Pentium      12 Sec      Linux
> >SPARC IPC    68 seconds  (with other processes running)
> >SPARC 2      37 seconds  (with other processes running)
> >SPARC Ultra   3 seconds  140 Mhz UltraSPARC
> >
> >Pentium 60   19 seconds  DOS 6.2
> >Pentium 90   15 seconds  DOS 6.2
> >386/25      287 seconds  DOS 6.2 <grin>
> >486/66       22 seconds  Win 95
> >Pent Pro/200  6 seconds  Win 95
> >
> >Mac IIci    180 seconds  68030 @ 16 Mhz
> >Quadra 800   80 Seconds  68040 @ 33 Mhz
> >Mac 8500/150 18 Seconds  (MacPERL installed for PowerPC)
> >
> >I cannot understand why the 8500 isn't much faster than a Pentium/60 and
> >why a Quadra 800 isn't closer to the same speed as a 486/66.
>
>
>
>
>***** Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch


--
Paul DuBois
paul@snake.net
Home Page: http://www.primate.wisc.edu/people/dubois
Software:  http://www.primate.wisc.edu/software



***** Want to unsubscribe from this list?
***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch