chris wrote: >The only difference between the two are the >name, the package code (WWW instead of WWW½), and the fact that it does >taint checks. is that going to cause a problem with webservers allowing the file to be served as a file when you don't intend it to because its not a WWW½ file? as i understand it, webservers (or at least webstar and qpq) will not serve WWW½ files as a security measure, which implies that they might serve WWW files. cheers iain (remembering the lasso problem...) ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch