According to Paul J. Schinder: > > There's not a great need, since 68k binaries also run on PowerPC. The only > reason a BigPPC would be needed is if you need both the portability and the > additional speed. > Hmmmmmmm..... ok. Let me try it this way: >From what I have heard, one of the releases of the MacOS will soon not support 68k programs since the 68k systems are now somewhere around five to six years old. Would it not, therefore, make sense to make a BigPPC version of MacPerl to not only take advantage of the hardware and software improvements since the 68k systems were around but to also get ready for such a possibility? Or is what I have heard about simply the switch which Rhapsody is going to cause? Which would then mean everyone switches over to Perl from MacPerl? TIA! :-) ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch