In article <mac-perl.199808121257.OAA28691@gwaihir.ee.ethz.ch>, Matthias Ulrich Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> wrote: >I still think the C/C++ backend option is overrated. What is missing in >this debate is that the C/C++ backend still needs at least 80% of the >Perl runtime,if not 100%, to run. Is most of this there to support "eval $string" and the like (things which sill require an full interpreter)? Would it be possible to cut this down significantly by just outlawing a few of Perl's features? >Byte code should be a massive improvement in speed vs. source code I presume that this will allow distribution of executables without human-readable source code? If so, will they be (unfortunately) trivial to decompile? Is there a general Perl FAQ anywhere on these subjects--ie, upcoming features and their ramifications? -- __________________________________________________________________________ Jeff Clites Online Editor http://www.MacTech.com/ online@MacTech.com MacTech Magazine __________________________________________________________________________ ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch