>In article <mac-perl.199808121257.OAA28691@gwaihir.ee.ethz.ch>, Matthias >Ulrich Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> wrote: > >>I still think the C/C++ backend option is overrated. What is missing in >>this debate is that the C/C++ backend still needs at least 80% of the >>Perl runtime,if not 100%, to run. > >Is most of this there to support "eval $string" and the like (things which >sill require an full interpreter)? Would it be possible to cut this down >significantly by just outlawing a few of Perl's features? WHAT ?????? eval is one of the most unique and powerfull feature of Perl it couldn't be conceivable tgo remove that and still prented this is perl. > >>Byte code should be a massive improvement in speed vs. source code > >I presume that this will allow distribution of executables without >human-readable source code? If so, will they be (unfortunately) trivial to >decompile? This would be the same kind of debate we've seen 4 years ago when java starting to make noise, ask your'self what is the current situation about decompiling class file. The point is not to make an opaque wayt o make money about selling perl scripts or module it is to enhance the compile stage problem and provide much more speed when executing over and over cgi or mod-like plugs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Vincent Nonnenmacher DPI SA 116 Av de la Republique 38320 BRESSON tel : (33) 476 33 25 06 mailto:dpi@pobox.oleane.com fax : (33) 476 33 25 01 http://worldserver.oleane.com/DPI ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch