Christopher F. Blanford (blanf001@tc.umn.edu) wrote: >I'm trying to convert binary files from a pre-MS-DOS computer (it even has >8 inch floppies) into comma-separated ASCII values. In these files are >32-bit real numbers (in IEEE format, i.e., 1 bit sign, 8 bit exponent, 23 >bit remainder) Hmmm...I'd tread carefully here. "pre MS-DOS" sounds like it might imply "pre-IEEE standard." IEEE 854 is, I think, dated 1987. There was a predecessor, IEEE 754, but I don't think it predated 854 by very many years. Prior to that, there were very few genuine standards...everything from the VAX to S/370 to Cray-1 to CDC to Harris to whatever had its own take on fp representation and semantics, and sometimes several versions depending on what machine option you owned. If you're dealing with a machine old enough to use 8" diskettes, you've probably got pot luck numbers. None of this will make much difference if your numbers are just of the "1.245" variety, but it could make quite a bit of difference if you're doing matrix computation, numerical analysis, etc., and assuming a set of numerical or representational properties that don't really apply to your dataset. jse ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch