After seeing some of the posts, all ultimately generated by George Cingolani's original question, I have to admit to changing my mind. I do come from a UNIX background, and I didn't look at Perl until a variety of shells, C, awk etc. were all second-nature. I tried to put myself in the shoes of someone starting out with MacPerl and without similar prior exposure, and I'll buy the arguments that've been made. On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Eric Dobbs wrote: > As the MacPerl user base grows (you do want it to grow don't > you?) it's unrealistic to expect only pure MacPerl questions. > Please reply to such questions with brief but specific > pointers like Vicki's example, look in the "Help menu under > Foo". If you're going to answer with "RTFM", please at least > suggest which manual, pod, or faq. This all makes sense. I'm willing to bend over (a fair bit :-)) to ensure that MacPerl sticks around, and I'm not going to Carp excessively over whether a question relates to pure Perl or not. I'll still stand by my assertion that questions to c.l.p.misc get pretty decent treatment. And since it came up, there's other newsgroup(s) for CGI. I left in the reference to RTFM because if there's one acronym that burns me, this is it. The F doesn't mean "fiddling" or "freaking" or anything else other than a good old Anglo-Saxon word, just like in the acronym SNAFU, and I personally think that this is one piece of shorthand that has no place in civilized discussion. I think the idea of a mini-FAQ is good, and the suggestion was made that it be delivered as an initial email when joining the list - also good. ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch