On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Richard Gordon wrote: > I guess one sticking point that I have is that I am having some trouble > seeing why this is actually worthwhile beyond sounding like a pretty > interesting exercise? The best reason that I can think of is that it's > probably faster than just relying on AppleScript, but maybe I'm overlooking > something else? Anyway, if you get something to work in MacPerl, I'd like to > see it. I can't speak for Chris, but he does explain the motivation behind Mac::Glue in the accompanying HTML. It's quite basic: he likes Perl and doesn't like AppleScript. It's mostly a syntax argument. I've used AppleScript just a bit, and I have to agree with him. AppleScript (at least the English dialect, which is the only one I've looked at) is pretty terrible for intuitively expressing what I want to do. It's on a par with CorelScript when it comes right down to it, as far as I'm concerned. AppleScript is verbose, excessively so. Also, in Perl there are usually umpteen ways of doing something - note the word "doing" - it strikes me that in AppleScript there are umpteen different ways of *writing* something. So it's mostly about harnessing AppleEvents, cutting AppleScript out of the loop, and letting Perl take over. All personal preference, really. ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch