At 05.16 -0400 1999.04.16, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >The whole reason I'm on most of my mailing lists is to participate in >discussion. The MacPerl lists, in particular, seem to me to be those where >one should, by default, be composing a reply for the (hypothetical) >benefit of everyone on the list. > >So, for my part, the "reply to list" by default makes more sense. The >duplicates are starting to irk me, too. I tend to agree. Consider, however, that the larger a list gets, the longer it takes to get replies that only go through the list. I think the reason perl5-porters has no reply-to: list is because of that fact. It could take hours to get a reply otherwise. But I don't think we have that problem here, except for when there is an outage somewhere (mail server, network, etc.). -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org