On 5/2/99 at 12:02 AM, rosattin@ajc.com wrote: > Have you looked at FaceSpan from Digital Technology > (www.facespan.com)? It's a GUI development tool in which objects are > backed up by applescript routines. Yes. FaceSpan yields slower final products, isn't threaded, doesn't have a debugger, doesn't use an object-oriented language, can't talk to ODBC datasources, can't cross-compile with Windows, and doesn't have a cool cool cool sprite engine. To the best of my knowledge, FaceSpan also isn't appearance-savvy, and doesn't support double-byte script systems. RealBasic does all of the above; its O'Reilly book is in editing. RB costs about as much as FaceSpan, a little more for the full price, a little less at the education rate. I'd honestly be willing to overlook pretty much all of the above, except I can't stand applescript's syntax, and the idea of writing even a moderately complicated application with it makes me break out in a cold sweat. I'm not a huge fan of RealBasic syntax either, but it's substantially clearer and more consistent than AS, and there's a lot more documentation available than there's ever been in the applescript world. Clearly, if you're already comfortable and skilled with applescript, facespan makes a good proposition, but RB brings a lot more to the table. -nat ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org