At 23.50 -0400 1999.06.02, Peter Prymmer wrote: >It would appear that Apple has been beefing up Applescript in recent >releases of it's Mac OS, but I think they played a part in the Mach/MkLinux >port and that comes with perl. Hence to the extent that Apple recoups >revenue >from MkLinux they too are profiting from perl (not to mention the internal >use >within Apple engineering). So I guess that the question >becomes Will Apple invest anything in perl? There really wasn't any porting issue with MkLinux, except for a slight change to the flags to pass for dynamic loading to work, and I provided a patch for that (after being told what to do by someone else not affiliated directly with Apple, on a newsgroup or mailing list or something). Also, Apple doesn't make much money, if any, from MkLinux. Perhaps you mean the other, almost completely unrelated, Mach-based OS project? Mac OS X? Mac OS X will make a lot of money for Apple (probably), and it did require some porting. The core changes are now in 5.005_57 (under "rhapsody", not "Mac OS X", which may or may not be a good idea :/ ). Apple already has inversted some money in Perl, by having an employee do this porting work. Will they continue to do more? I dunno. Maybe Apple can pay someone to port Matthias' toolbox extensions to the "rhapsody" perl, or have someone do it internally (such as Matthias himself!). I think such an effort would be best to wait until Carbon is finished, though, anyway. It still seems a bit premature to me to invest much effort in it. Note: I have installed and used Darwin, the open source version of Mac OS X Server, and its perl seems to work just fine (5.005_02 with some patches from Apple). Nothing much to say about it: it's perl. -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org