On Wed, 2 Jun 1999, Douglas A. spore wrote: > "Our mission is to make Perl as popular as possible," he said." > > Anyone who believes this last statement is very nive. Just look at what MS > did to Sun and Java, or for that matter the great majority of the teaming > efforts that MS has undertaken. (editorial comment ;-) > > I know that this is off topic but I thought that eveyone would like to know > what is happening in the windoze comunity. > Doug Spore > I don't see this as being particularly sinister. It's a smart move on MS's part, but I think they're also smart enough to recognize that they stand to only lose if they push for a *WinPerl* dialect. What they really need on Windows + Perl is what ActiveState has already been doing, but more of the same. As it stands right now Perl on Windows has problems - just look at the number of questions in the newsgroups. Working in a DOS window just doesn't cut it in 1999, and access to the Windows API is pathetic. You need a PhD just to get the ODBC and OLE stuff properly working, the build process for XS is complicated and the AS PPM repository is often behind, and I believe nobody on the planet has ever successfully gotten IIS to work with Perl CGI. :-) Windows is here to stay, and while it's my least favourite OS, there are plenty of situations where I have to use it. And as such I like having Perl available. So it's better that it's a smoothly-running Perl. I just don't see that this is any different from the large effort Apple puts into keeping Java a viable language on MacOS. Arved ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org