At 11.45 -0500 1999.11.28, Ronald J Kimball wrote: >In fact, I would say it the other way around: tr/// does not mean >"transliterate", but some people think it does. Well, you can say that, but I won't. Anyway, this is kinda off topic, so quickly: I think you are slightly misrepresenting the argument. Basically, transliterate is defined in my dictionaries as to REPRESENT (not necessarily "spell", which blurs the issue) a word in another alphabet (which to my mind includes "character sets"). Clearly tr/// involves representing letters in another character set. And even if you disagree with the slight loosening of the definition of "alphabet", it is still very close. And even if you still disagree, there is always Rule #1 ("Larry is always right"). Larry likes "transliterate" better, and the docs have been changed accordingly, with his blessing. http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-04/msg00606.html That's just a short summary. If anyone cares to learn more, read all sides of the discussion. http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-04/msg00525.html -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org