>I wonder if any of these marker ideas has the hope of hawaiian shorts in >the arctic of working on Windows? (First, you have to build the heated >green-house, you see, ... .) I don't see any reason why it wouldn't. The only problems would be a) Nothing can appear "on" the desktop, b) the desktop is obscured by a window or c) one can only position items to snap to grid. So on Windows it happens to be a link/alias/shortcut rather than a physical object - the technique could still be the same. Any X-based window manager for *nix that allows arbitrary positioning of links on the "desktop" would allow the same approach. >But what really worries me is whether Darwin/Mac OS X can support this >kind of convenience? I read between the lines on the announcements, and I >can't find reason to hope that the desktop will survive the jump into the >new technology. I'd get the Darwin CD and check, but I don't have any >hardware to run it on. Darwin has no graphical interface in its current incarnation. At least I don't think anyone's successfully compiled an X Window Server for it. It's "just" unix on mach. It certainly doesn't have OS X's Aqua layer and desktop paradigm. As with any ordinary *nix, anything it uses would depend on the X Window Manager in use. Without violating non-disclosure on OS X, I can say that OS X Server allows for symbolic links/aliases to appear on the desktop and to be positioned arbitrarily. -Charles Albrecht cwa2@cornell.edu # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org