On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > If we're done with the Perl advocacy and the language comparisons, can we > please go back to our regularly scheduled fun with Perl? But language comparison is Fun With Perl! 'cos you can usually demonstrate how much more Fun Perl is than language XXX. I'll admit that language comparison on FWP should be have a different criteria for judging languages than any other mailing list. The FWP criteria should be is "Can you have more Fun with language XXX than you can have with Perl? Yes / No and some examples." I'll admit those like myself (fortran, c, c++, scheme, lisp, pascal, perl, dcl, awk, bash, algol, assembler, R, actor, basic, xml...) who collect languages have slightly warped senses of FUN, but please don't rain on our parade. There Is More Than One Way To Have Fun With Perl. Thanks, John Carter Work Email : john@netsys.co.za Private email : cyent@mweb.co.za Yell Phone : 083-543-6915 Phone : 27-12-348-4246 Death is nature's gentle way of saying, "Relax". ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe