>>>>> "PS" == Peter Scott <Peter@PSDT.com> writes: PS> Having utterly failed to crack Schwern's conundrum, the only thing PS> to do is pose one of my own, this one evaluating to an IMHO more PS> familiar quotation: PS> fork ? exit : POSIX::setsid && (grep { $_ eq ref } @ARGV)[-1] my first guess is children should be seen and not heard. but i can't figure out the mapping to the code. the setsid call makes the child have no terminal so it can't be heard from. $_ eq ref will only be true for $_ = ''. where that fits is unknown to me. uri -- Uri Guttman --------- uri@sysarch.com ---------- http://www.sysarch.com SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe