At 03:12 PM 3/15/01 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "PS" == Peter Scott <Peter@PSDT.com> writes: > > PS> Having utterly failed to crack Schwern's conundrum, the only thing > PS> to do is pose one of my own, this one evaluating to an IMHO more > PS> familiar quotation: > > PS> fork ? exit : POSIX::setsid && (grep { $_ eq ref } @ARGV)[-1] > >my first guess is children should be seen and not heard. but i can't >figure out the mapping to the code. > >the setsid call makes the child have no terminal so it can't be heard >from. On the right track :-) >$_ eq ref will only be true for $_ = ''. where that fits is unknown to >me. Well there's some license there, but it could also be true for classes overloading stringification. "overload" is not part of the answer :-) -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies ==== Want to unsubscribe from Fun With Perl? Well, if you insist... ==== Send email to <fwp-request@technofile.org> with message _body_ ==== unsubscribe