In Regards to your letter <199605011652.SAA29165@solair4b.eunet.be>: > I've experimented a little with droplets. I found out that with droplets, > the data fork is *empty*. This is where text files keep their text. So I can > see no good reason why this use of a "TEXT" resource. Just think along with me: The original purpose of the 'TEXT' resources was to allow one to include "required" modules, etc., so that one could distribue one file for a script, and not have to worry about where to find all of the required modules. This capability should be retained. tim. time@ice.com (UUCP: heifetz!tbomb!time) USENET - a slow moving self parody... ph