Peter Van Avermaet <PVanAver@inetgate.capvolmac.nl> writes: >Thank you for the explanation. It sounds a bit like the setext format. Yes, but tilted a bit more towards formatting and less towards plaintext viewing. >I understand that there is a pod viewer for Mac, called Shuck. Included in the 5.1.0 distribution. >I remember having seen a URL that started with "pod:" - are there really Web >browsers out there that read pod, or was that a joke / a wish ? None of the above. Urlification makes it possible to use Internet Config to do the dispatching (purists may object that pod, as opposed to ftp and http, is not a protocol at all. >Is there a specification somewhere for the pod format ? Yes. It is, of course, written in pod. See "Various" -> "Documentation Format" in the help menu. Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~neeri "And that's why I am going to turn this world upside down, and make of it a fire so *bright* that someone real will notice" -- Vernor Vinge, _Tatja Grimm's World_