Tim Endres <time@ice.com> in message <01BC13AC.C574F390@pc.ice.com> writes: >This is addressed on page 332 of the new Camel book. If you provide >the "-i" switch with no extension, then you do not get a backup file and >do not have to do the unlink of the backup file. Since 'undef-ing' $^I is >supposed to turn off inplace editing, I suspect that $^I = ""; would be >the equivalent of "-i", and thus the script might reduce to simply: > > $/ = "\012"; > $^I = ""; > while ( <> ) { s/\012/\015/g; print; } I find this results in a MacPerl error. There seems to be no way that the creation of a back-up file can be avoided in MacPerl. If S^I is set to 'undef' then MacPerl ignores it (as it should according to PP page 137). $^I = "" does not behave in the same way as $^I = undef. It seems therefore that -i with no extension (in Unix Perl) does not have the same effect as $^I = "" in MacPerl. But perhaps it doesn't in Unix Perl either? Alan Fry.