>At 17.47 1998.03.12, nghai wrote: >>If I'm distributing a runtime created by MacPerl, how does this fall into >>the Perl Artistic License? >> >>The runtime is currently distributed as Freeware but may become or future >>programs may be shareware...is there a difference? > >Christ Nandor replied >>As I understand it, you can give away, sell, change, redistribute in any >>manner, what you create that runs on Perl or MacPerl. The one thing you >>cannot do is change MacPerl and call it MacPerl. >> >>But as always, IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer). > >That makes sense but since the MacPerl runtime technically contains the >MacPerl interpreter, would that be considered redistributing MacPerl? No. Although technically it would be possible to turn a runtime into a MacPerl application again, I consider it simply a Perl script with a (rather large) bit of glue code :-) Matthias ----- Matthias Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~neeri "And that's why I am going to turn this world upside down, and make of it a fire so *bright* that someone real will notice" -- Vernor Vinge, _Tatja Grimm's World_ ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch