On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Paul J. Schinder wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 06:57:20 -0400 (AST), Arved Sandstrom wrote: > > > >In terms of handling the Makefile.mk, well, Matthias did the work to > >convert dmake to an MPW tool. I suspect that we may also be looking at > >doing some coding to convert dmake to a scriptable app. Then, maybe > >Mac::Glue... ? > > That would be pointless, IMHO. The basic purpose of make is to build > software using a compiler. (Of course it can do mora but that's because it > knows how to hand off to a shell.) Without a compiler, why fool with > make? > > For a non-XS module what we need is I) get the archive from CPAN, 2) > unpack the archive, making sure of end-of-line, 3) build blib, 4) copy > into place, site_ perl by default but user overridable. All that can be > done by MacPerl itself. In addition, we'd like a tool that can search CPAN > like CPAN. pm can, understands enough about Makefile.PL to do things like > check Perl version and check module requirements, and run the tests, if > any. But the get/unpack/put in proper place capability is fundamental, and > the pieces already exist to do that entirely in Perl. Yeah, I'm getting scrambled all in the same post. :-) My stream of thought regarding a more-automated *XS* build process crept into what is a more sensible goal at this point - automating the non-XS installation process - which reaches more of the community anyhow. In any case I'm fully aware of what make does - I've written a few makefiles in my time. >From time to time I may forget that we're currently talking about a system sans development tools. Just slap me down again when that happens. Arved ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch