At 19.12 -0500 1999.01.13, Arved Sandstrom wrote: >I did have one thought, and maybe it's worth discussing now before >everything gets locked in. What about support for patches? I'm thinking of >a situation where correction of a single line in a single file of a Module >of Death *is* the port, or something almost as trivial, in a pure Perl >module. I know memory is cheap, but I cringe thinking of putting a whole >Mac port up on a site just because line 212 in file UnixCentric.pm uses / >instead of :. > >Maybe a parallel patch page on this hypothetical site? Click on the link >for SlightlyWrong-1.00 and get the patches for it. Or some such... > >Assume I know nothing of diff & patch capabilities on MacOS. Which is >pretty close to the truth, I've only ever really used these tools on UNIX. >Is this doable? Practical? Well, patch and diff are MPW tools. But most people won't have them. There is a diff in Perl, I dunno about a patch. But regardless, it sounds like more room for pilot error. Perhaps for relatively "minor" ports we can simply work out a system of smaller archives. OTOH, as you say, disk space is cheap, and bandwith is getting cheap, and almost all of these potential ported (non-XS) archives are well under 50K anyway. -- Chris Nandor mailto:pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6']) ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch