On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Chris Nandor wrote: > But now an aside. Is anyone else concerned about memory and Perl? Yes. > I guess my question is this: who is finding a lack of RAM is a real > hindrance to doing the work they want to do with MacPerl? The one Perl droplet I've used externally, in the sense that I set it up on another person's machine to perform a task, was severely limited by memory. It required about a 16 MB memory partition to parse a 1.5 MB file; the machine in question only had 16 MB of real memory. It was out of the question to upgrade the machine's memory, especially since the utility would be used maybe three times a year. On the positive side, you could debug where in the script Perl was, based upon the sounds emitted by the hard drive. :) The sounds came from virtual memory, since the file was in memory being recognized, split, and sorted. Also, I think MacPerl's usefulness diminishes as a helper when it demands the lion's share of memory. Hammers with 100 pound heads can really "pound" nails, but no one wants to use them. But who doesn't want a smaller footprint and faster speed and more features in someone else's code? -- MattLangford ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org