At 09:42 -0400 6/16/99, Richard Gordon wrote: > At 19:52 -0400 6/15/1999, Chris Nandor wrote: >>The idea indeed is that the work being done for NT to get fork running may >>be applicable to MacPerl (and VMS) in the future. Maybe. Matthias might >>have more to say, but I doubt anyone will have more to say of substance >>until Sarathy et al finish it for NT. > > Wouldn't all of this stuff become available under OS X without > getting involved in emulation schemes? My assumption is that if > MacPerl undergoes a rewrite for OS X, it would take advantage of any > native features of the OS and I further assume that fork() etc are > native features of OS X. Maybe. Eventually. When Mac OS X is "final". But that still won't help people who aren't using Mac OS X, and that's gonna be a lot of people. Especially when Apple keeps "rasing the bar" regarding which hardware OS X will run on :-( -- -- |\ _,,,---,,_ Vicki Brown <vlb@cfcl.com> ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Journeyman Sourceror: Scripts & Philtres |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' P.O. Box 1269 San Bruno CA 94066 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) http://www.cfcl.com/~vlb http://www.macperl.org ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org