At 0:35 +0100 2000.11.20, Bart Lateur wrote: >On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:05:41 -0500, Chris Nandor wrote: >>I think this would make it better. Thoughts? The big problem I have here >>is changing the public interface, especially since we are already at a 1.00 >>release. > >Your function can accept both. It is pretty common in functions in >modules, to check the type of arguments argument, and act accordingly. This is a question of what a user-supplied error handler will get as its arguments. I cannot pass both forms of arguments to that handler, only one. :) -- Chris Nandor pudge@pobox.com http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network pudge@osdn.com http://osdn.com/ # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org