At 20:34 -0500 11/19/00, Chris Nandor wrote: >At 0:35 +0100 2000.11.20, Bart Lateur wrote: >>On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 11:05:41 -0500, Chris Nandor wrote: >>>I think this would make it better. Thoughts? The big problem I have here >>>is changing the public interface, especially since we are already at a 1.00 >>>release. >> >>Your function can accept both. It is pretty common in functions in >>modules, to check the type of arguments argument, and act accordingly. > >This is a question of what a user-supplied error handler will get as its >arguments. I cannot pass both forms of arguments to that handler, only >one. :) > That would seem to suggest a different module, or a differently-named function of the one module...with the old way included but deprecated, and going away soon enough for Chris to keep his sanity. Sounds like a lot of extra work for Chris, unfortunately. --John -- John Baxter jwblist@olympus.net Port Ludlow, WA, USA # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org