Hi, I wasn't actually saying that I wanted to switch. I was just wondering what else was out there -- if there were indeed something better than BBEdit. Alpha doesn't really seem necessary to what I do, so I'll probably stick with BBEdit. Thanks, Rich At 02:48 PM 8/25/97 -0700, you wrote: >At 12:16 -0700 on 970819, Webmaster wrote: >> I must say, I probably wouldn't use MacPerl if I didn't have BBEdit. Word 6 >> is too big and bulky for my 2nd-generation PowerMac, I can't get my hands >> on Word 5, and SimpleText never ceases to infuriate me. (But then again, >> anything's better than emacs!) Does anyone use a different editor with >> MacPerl, something with multiple-level undos? I'm not all that familiar >> with Macs, so any info is greatly appreciated. > > >A lot of people like Alpha (as you can see from the list). > >However, as you are already using BBEdit, I must ask why you want to switch >to something else. BBEdit has multiple undo capability; it's got >syntax-sensitive coloration; it's got complete regular expressions; it's >got extensions to let you run MacPerl scripts from BBEdit and edit from >inside MacPerl; it's got multi-file find/replace. > >What's missing? > >If you've been using BBEdit Lite, check out the commercial version of >BBEdit. The upgrade price is pretty good if you've already got Lite or a >"competitive" product (see the Web site). BBEdit 4.5 has complete support >for Perl 5.0 syntax, an HTML table editor and various additional >improvements. > >I'm not knocking Alpha (I don't use it but the people who do seem to love >it). I'm just asking - why change editors? > >----------- >Vicki Brown, vlb@apple.com <> Journeyman Sourcerer: Scripts & Philtres >..Toolsmith, Firewarden, Web Gardener, Stagehand, *nixophiliac, JAPH... >Apple Computer: Rhapsody Core OS <> MkLinux: http://www.mklinux.apple.com > ___ UNIX is user-friendly ___ > (It just isn't promiscuous about which users it is friendly with) > > > Rich Goldman rich@cgninteractive.com