At 19:53 -0500 7/19/98, Matthew Langford wrote: >I think there might be some consensus growing that having a separate set >of MacPerl additions + the standard distribution would be a Good Thing for >a future goal--although I, for one, haven't felt the need to build MacPerl >from scratch. But that's about as close as I can see getting under the >current MacOS. If MacOS X _is_ SUfficiently Close To Unix (SUCTU), then >maybe Matthias will be able to drop the IDE and work on Toolbox support. >And MacPerl will be strikingly like Unix perl (maybe become CPAN parts). As of now, MacOS X will run on G3 machines (and there's a faint ray of hope for at least some 604 machines). What will it run on when (or if) it's actually released? [Ignoring PowerBooks, of which there are two *series* of G3 machines, there are already two distinct boards for the desktop G3s. Will Apple decide that the original G3 board isn't worth bothering to support?] [Will Apple decide that the iMac isn't worth supporting with MacOS X? <unlikely, but history suggests not impossible>] Will that be a sufficiently large subset of machines that most members of the MacPerl community will have one? ...will have mostly such machines? In other words, while MacOS X is potentially helpful in running Perl from (nearly) the standard distribution, it doesn't do anything for a good fraction of the machines which today run MacPerl. Is the MacPerl community willing to ask Matthias to abandon MacPerl-which-runs-on-most-Macs and work on something else when <if> MacOS X arrives. [There's the other issue of what does Matthias want to work on.] --John -- John Baxter jwblist@olympus.net Port Ludlow, WA, USA Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him to fish, and you get rid of him for the weekend. ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch