At 5:59 -0800 7/19/98, Paul J. Schinder wrote: > >The point is, it is no longer a port. Download and unpack the source for >5.005. You'll find README.amiga right along side README.beos. Sarathy >meant what he said: "builds on". I'm sorry. I am going to continue to have a problem with this. Perl "just builds on" VMS, BeOS (I mean, who actually uses BeOS?), Windows, DOS, and the AMIGA for heaven's sakes but not MacOS. Not to mention OS/2 (a good OS from all reports but not exactly in wide distribution!) and QNX. What exactly _is_ QNX? Notably absent, yet in more popular use than most of the above, is Mac OS. This feels wrong. I hear the reasons. I don't have to like them. The _implication_ is that Mac OS is either too weird, or that we're a cult operating system, or that no one really wants to run Perl on a Mac. OK, so those are incorrect implications, but there you are. They are also valid implications. >From the discussion here, things are getting better. Patches are being sent back. That I do like. I want people to be able to download a perl distribution from one location (I do not care how many archives) and build it. Yes, they need the correct build environment. That goes without saying. Sheesh; Solaris doesn't come by default with a compiler either. Personally (Tom C doesn't want to hear this :-) I do not want to build perl. I don't want to _need_ to build perl. I am decidedly annoyed when I am required to build perl. But when everyone else has the option, in the mainstream release, I think it looks really funny that we don't. Whether or not we take advantage of it. nuff said. we now return you to your regular list topics. Vicki Brown, vlb@cfcl.com |\ _,,,---,,_ Journeyman Sourceror ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Scripts & Philtres |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' http://www.cfcl.com/~vlb '---''(_/--' `-'\_) P.O. Box 1269 San Bruno, CA 94066 ***** Want to unsubscribe from this list? ***** Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to mac-perl-request@iis.ee.ethz.ch