In article <3817a37c.2960018@relay.skynet.be>, bart.lateur@skynet.be (Bart Lateur) writes: > On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 17:30:36 -0700, Larry F. Allen-Tonar wrote: >> I think a 'fat' MacPerl is still a good idea, as there is at least one >> local network with both 68K and PPC machines on it. >> At 11:07 PM +0200 10/26/99, Matthias Neeracher wrote: >> >>> I'm currently opposed to separating 68K and PPC installs, because in my >>> (somewhat dated) administration experience, it was really convenient to have a >>> single installer from which to install 68K, PPC, and fat, as appropriate >>> (plus, >>> if you want to make fat standalones, you need a fat application. >> Yup. Yup. Yup. > Can we not reverse the process? Strip what you don't need from an > installed MacPerl? I'm thinking of a small app which would throw away > from the MacPerl executable, what you don't need. That is, in fact, exactly what the MacPerl installer already does unless you explicitly specify a fat installation. Matthias -- Matthias Neeracher <neeri@iis.ee.ethz.ch> http://www.iis.ee.ethz.ch/~neeri "And that's why I am going to turn this world upside down, and make of it a fire so *bright* that someone real will notice" -- Vernor Vinge, _Tatja Grimm's World_ # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org