At 21:21 -0500 2/19/00, Larry Moore wrote: >At 16:50 -0800 19/02/2000, Rich Morin wrote: >>At 7:41 PM -0500 2/19/00, Larry Moore wrote: >>>To: majordomo@macperl.org >>>... >> >>Whoops! It looks like you should be using: >> >> To: macperl-scribes-request@macperl.org >> From: your email address >> Subject: >> >> subscribe >> >Looks like there's more than one way to do that too :-) This way worked and >the other also. Smart majordomo. :-) It's typical to set Majordomo up so that listname-request@... works, as does majordomo@.... The other typical way is to omit the listname-request alias and require the Majordomo address be used. The listname-request is handled by an alias which pipes the message to Majordomo with a command line flag which specifies the list. In the absence of the flag, Majordomo expects the list name in the command line(s) in the message (there is a majordomo alias which pipes to Majordomo without the list name flag). And for good measure, you can specify a list name in a command to a listname-request address. ;-) If you do that and the list names differ, the command in the body of the message "wins". [Just tested with a couple of lists I run.] --John (there's some rather "interesting" Perl code in Majordomo) To be complete, I note that the piping is actually to a small C program which "wraps" Majordomo, making it safer...a parameter to the wrapper is the program name which is to be run, and wrapper knows where that program is. I believe the wrapper goes away in Majordomo 2, which may yet be released before the "true" change of decade/century/millennium. Or may not. -- John Baxter jwblist@olympus.net Port Ludlow, WA, USA # ===== Want to unsubscribe from this list? # ===== Send mail with body "unsubscribe" to macperl-request@macperl.org